US Law Supreme Court Resorces

Press Release Regarding February Oral Argument Session
Supreme Court of the US, January 22, 2021
The Supreme Court will listen all oral arguments scheduled for the February consultation by using telephone conference, following the identical format used for the preceding teleconference arguments. In preserving with public health steering in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The Court constructing stays open for reputable enterprise only and closed to the public till further be aware. The Court will preserve to closely screen public fitness steerage in figuring out plans for...

The Problem With Trump’s Odious Pardon of Steve Bannon
The New York Times, January 21, 2021
It is corrupt and a possible obstruction of justice and must be legally challenged.

Now to be had on Oyez: This month’s oral argument audio aligned with the transcripts
SCOTUSblog, January 21, 2021
Oyez has posted the aligned audio and transcripts from the November 2020 oral arguments on the Supreme Court. The court docket heard argument this month in: Pham v. Guzman Chavez Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski AMG Capital v. Federal Trade Commission Federal Communications Commission v. Prometheus Radio BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore The post Now available on Oyez: This month’s oral argument audio aligned with the transcripts appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Biden asume como presidente en medio de los angeles crisis
The New York Times, January 20, 2021
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. y Kamala Devi Harris tomaron juramento en un Capitolio que aún se tambaleaba tras el ataque de una turba violenta en un momento en que l. a. pandemia sigue asolando a Estados Unidos.

Argument evaluation: Justices divided in procedural war between Baltimore, oil corporations in climate combat
SCOTUSblog, January 20, 2021
In a speech at Harvard Law School in 2015, Justice Elena Kagan instructed the target audience that “we’re all textualists now” – this is, that any attempt to interpret a statute starts (and often ends) with the language of the statute. That principle may ultimately show dispositive in BP v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore,…

Trump’s Manipulation of the Courts
Justia's Verdict, December 28, 2020
Steven D. Schwinn, a professor of law at the University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School, explains how the Supreme Court’s latest decision allowing the Trump management to continue with efforts to exclude undocumented extraterrestrial beings from the census is constant with the management’s manipulation of the courts to acquire illegal policy. Professor Schwinn describes why that the Court’s ruling in the census case is the perfect bookend to the tour ban ruling he received early in his presidency.