Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (April five, 2021)
Google’s copying of those strains of Java SE code that have been needed to allow programmers to call upon prewritten computing tasks to be used in their own applications changed into a fair use of that fabric as a matter of regulation.
Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid (April 1, 2021)
To qualify as an “automatic telephone dialing machine” below the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, a tool ought to have the ability both to keep a smartphone variety the usage of a random or sequential variety generator or to supply a telephone variety the usage of a random or sequential range generator.
Federal Communications Commission v. Prometheus Radio Project (April 1, 2021)
A Federal Communications Commission decision to repeal or regulate three ownership regulations that limit the quantity of radio stations, television stations, and newspapers that a single entity may additionally own in a given market changed into no longer arbitrary and capricious beneath the Administrative Procedures Act.
Mays v. Hines (March 29, 2021)
Supreme Court reverses the Sixth Circuit's order granting habeas relief with appreciate to a 1985 homicide; great evidence linked the defendant to the crime, so he suffered no prejudice as a result of his lawyer's alleged useless help.
Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (March 25, 2021)
State courts may exercising precise jurisdiction over an car manufacturer in merchandise-legal responsibility suits stemming from car accidents that injured country citizens even though the motors were designed and manufactured somewhere else, and originally were bought out of doors the forum Cases by Date by using Volume
Are Alaska Native businesses Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question
Are Alaska Native organizations — unique companies that Congress created in 1971 whilst it resolved Native claims in Alaska — “Indian tribe[s]” beneath the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act? On Monday, the Supreme Court will pay attention argument on that query in Yellen v. Confederated... The publish Are Alaska Native companies Indian tribes? A multimillion-greenback query regarded first on SCOTUSblog.
The Daily: Who Is Really Winning inside the Supreme Court?
The New York Times,
We discover which religion agencies are counting victories in recent rulings. Plus, 15 years of The Book Review Podcast.
Immigration dispute may additionally determine whether or not tens of thousands of U.S. citizens can get green playing cards
Sanchez v. Mayorkas, scheduled for oral argument on Monday, focuses on whether or not noncitizens who have been granted humanitarian remedy from deportation can are trying to find lawful everlasting residency in the United States, via a manner referred to as “adjustment of repute,” with out first leaving the united states. Or have to... The put up Immigration dispute may additionally determine whether tens of hundreds of U.S. residents can get green playing cards regarded first on SCOTUSblog.
Supreme Court Commission to Scrutinize Changes Beyond Expanding Justice Seats
The New York Times,
President Biden’s new panel, which is set to fulfill on Friday, has targets to address many different proposals to overtake the court docket.
Media Advisory Regarding April and May Teleconference Argument Audio
Supreme Court of the USA,
Media Advisory Regarding Teleconference Argument Audio The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the April session, and the oral argument scheduled for May 4, by using cellphone conference. In maintaining with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and suggest will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to start at 10 a.m. On days whilst more than one case may be heard, there could be a three minute pause earlier than the second one case begins. The Court will...
Supreme Court Rules that Claims of Nazi-Era Expropriation of Jewish Property Are Barred through Germany’s Sovereign Immunity
NYU Law professor Samuel Estreicher and Hofstra Law professor Julian G. Ku touch upon a recent choice by means of the U.S. Supreme Court, holding that the doctrine of sovereign immunity bars claims based totally on Nazi-era expropriation of Jewish assets. Professors Estreicher and Ku argue that the unanimous choice if so, Germany v. Philipp reflects a now-solid fashion of Roberts Court decisions restricting the reach of U.S. regulation and jurisdiction to live in the territory of the US whilst also heading off arguable and unsettled interpretations of worldwide regulation.